Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by Savage_Hunter
* I don't think you believe that the wording of Genesis 1 is literal. Only the couple of words that you want to be your version of literal.


As this statement applies to Ringman, you would be wrong.




I'd say that it was meant to be a literal account of creation. It was believed to be literal. The ancient thinkers/writers had no idea of the scope and scale of the world, yet alone the Universe.