Originally Posted by MIKEWERNER
You must whole-heartedly support man-made global warming models.

Has science been politicized at all these last 50 years?

Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by MIKEWERNER
Originally Posted by Snyper
There is evidence for one of those theories


The science community always has it all figured out, eh?

[Linked Image]


No Scientist has ever asserted that science has always had it all figured out.

If you take a look at your chart on the atomic timeline, you will notice all that progress was made by scientist, and there was no contribution made by religion.


I do not support man made global warming models. As the Economist Thomas Sowell points out, the changes in temperature and CO2 levels do not correlate. In addition, statisticians have demonstrated that you can put totally random date into the climate models and still get the dreaded "hockey stick".

Nope, the evidence for human caused global warming is week, and contradictory, and none of the Chicken Littles have provided sufficient evidence that some warming would be bad. In their analysis, they fail to consider the benefits of a warming earth such as fewer cold deaths, and the ability to grow more crops in higher latitudes. Greenland used to be green, and Norway used to be a large producer of grapes, during the Medieval Warm Phase.

Liberals are not very skilled at evaluating both sides of an equation.

You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell