Originally Posted by TF49
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by TF49
Originally Posted by carbon12
Originally Posted by TF49


Equating God with some equations?

Not quite the same.


edit to add: But, you believe what you choose to believe. Believe in a Creator or believe in equations. You will choose won't you.



If gravity were only an equation, the basic physical Universe, as we know it, would be a strangely different.

Gravity may well be, by another name, God.



Seems that according to Hawking, gravity did not exist before the Spontaneous Creation. How could a relationship between mass exist before the mass existed. It could not be defined until after mass was created.

Nope, it is still circular.


What science defines as empty space has mass. If you want to understand it better, you might also want to read up on quantum fluctuations, and virtual particles.




"What science defines as empty space has mass."

Is that right?

OK, so where did the empty space come from and why does it have mass. This is certainly not "nothing."

I get it, "science" is defining "nothing" as "something" so we can show the universe came from "nothing."

If that is so, it is remarkably "circular."

TF


Equivocation is a common fallacy for those who are not scientifically literate.

The rest I've already explained to you.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell