As long as the Theist keep making their less then logical positive claims, The Atheist does not have to make or defend a positive claim.
AS - OK, then deal with my null (negative) hypotheis. There is not an atheist.
There are no Atheist is a positive Claim. The null hypothesis would be that Atheist do exist, and would be the default position Your positive claim that there are no Atheist is called the "alternative hypothesis", and it is this that you must provide evidence to prove before you can reject the null.
You are SO full of it with your pseudo-analysis of the hypothetical, and I never said "there are no atheist".
OK - hypothetically - into your silly game and to give you a null in your terms - an atheist does not exist. Now, prove that one does.
I am an Atheist.
If you think otherwise, you have not been paying attention.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
