Originally Posted by CCCC
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
As long as the Theist keep making their less then logical positive claims, The Atheist does not have to make or defend a positive claim.

AS - OK, then deal with my null (negative) hypotheis. There is not an atheist.



There are no Atheist is a positive Claim.

The null hypothesis would be that Atheist do exist, and would be the default position Your positive claim that there are no Atheist is called the "alternative hypothesis", and it is this that you must provide evidence to prove before you can reject the null.

Last edited by antelope_sniper; 09/01/15.

You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell