In the end, both atheists and Christians have the same evidence for God/gods...none. The Christian chooses to believe anyway and tries to convince you it's fact. The atheists chooses no belief and doesn't try to convince you of anything.
Who's more honest?"
I think the question was asked and answered by the OP.
First he makes an emphatic claim: ...both atheists and Christians have the same evidence for God/gods...none.
Then, after having made an emphatic/authoratative claim he says: "The atheists chooses no belief...here's the kicker...doesn't try to convince you of anything.
This he says after he makes the authoratative claim. He flatters himself in saying that he is not trying to convice you of anything. However, this can not be an honest statement because of his atheist dogma that preceeded it.
Atheist does not require evidence. A lack of evidence for a god or gods is sufficient not to accept the proposition.
On the other hand Anti-theist, those who assert "there are no gods", do have a burden of proof, and need to present it to support their positive proposition.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
