Let's get to brass tacks, here. We have several written witness accounts, and no evidence at all that they are factually incorrect.
We have some reporters reporting trivial stuff independently.
We have a sheriff's statement after the fact that contains several (I dare say) deliberate misstatements and factual errors. The suggestion he didn't speak to the deputies is mind boggling, if true.
Everything is being investigated by the ISP, which has a history of covering up gross police misconduct and harassing anyone that doesn't join the cover up.
And you wonder why we don't wait for whatever story the Sheriff, ISP and suspected murderers are cooking up together?
And you wonder why local witnesses are reluctant to speak out in fear of retaliation?
WOW..Great post and 100% correct in my eyes especially about retaliation...Last night at the Sheriffs meeting they ask the Sheriff if he would resign if the deputies were convicted of wrong doing..He said...NO
So there left with the currant Sheriff and deputies to deal with and be watched by.Know wonder they ain't talk'n publicly.
I say cop in this case instead of officer..Just 1 cop on your case in a small town looking for any reason too, is not a good thing.
