What the AG did NOT do (and had a GJ been empaneled and no billed) was preclude a civil case.... The AG can't prosecute or prove a crime. But, they didn't shut the door on anything else. Had they gone to a GJ and/or trial, those doors would have shut completely.
Every time it appears you've posted the dumbest fcking thing that could be posted........you outdo yourself.
How in the wide, wide world of law can an AG tell a private person they can't sue?
They got no right to do that. And nothing an AG could do could possibly stop this man's family from suing.
You'd be dangerously stupid, except no one on the fire takes your posts seriously.
BTW, moron, AG's CAN prosecute a case. That's what they're supposed to do.
When they *prosecute* a crime, they try and *prove* a crime, believe it or not.
This AG is either too crooked or too lazy to even try.
And, it may even be beneficial to the community for that to happen, because then the people can see the evidence, rather than speculate endlessly about how the reportage an be misconscrewed.
And again, moron, even if the cops were acquitted, the family can still sue, a la OJ Simpson.
What an idiot.
It depends entirely on state law, asshat. In MANY states, acquittal of criminal charges precludes civil suits for damages due to the higher bar of evidentiary proceedings and state law.
That you haven't a f'kin' clue is no surprise.
The AGs decisions in this case leave the doors WIDE open to civil suits, neither precluding nor clouding those cases from going forward.
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
