"Actually fellow, the whole thing is about halfwits jumping to conclusions with not a single solitary piece of evidence other than hearsay."
That's not exactly true. A corpse is pretty solid evidence of a homicide when it's riddled with bullet holes.
Unless someone wants to introduce another actor with a firearm, there is pretty solid evidence that the two Deputes are responsible for the homicide.
Now..... THEY should be the ones to provide evidence that it was a "justified" homicide.
Do you disagree?
I do.
It is the burden of the prosecutor to prove guilt, not the burden of the defendant to prove their innocence.
I'm pretty sure that we all know that's so, ONCE CHARGES ARE FILED.
Right now, we are in the court of public opinion, and different rules apply.
I don't recall any of you complaining when the Muslim Major at Ft. Hood was pronounced guilty, right here, in the court of public opinion. Some of you were the quickest to reach a verdict.
Am I classing these two deputies with a muslim terrorist?
No.... a muslim terrorist is killing people for an ideal... not from ego.
In his own warped way, he is living up to a trust, not betraying one.
