On which part? I pretty plainly said that if the cops did what folks were accusing them of, then put them under the jail. Waiting the evidence and investigation, though, instead of moving to lynch them always seemed like a good plan.for
Therein lies the difference.
IMO it should have been brought before a jury not decided behind closed doors by folks that in ways work together, and get pay checks from the same public.
A grand jury, perhaps, and I believe I said that. But, if there wasn't enough to prosecute then there really wasn't enough to potentially take to a grand jury, either.
I would need to go reread, and listen again, but IIRC he said to the effect that conflicting testimony would cause "reasonable doubt"
Still shiuoda been brought before a jury IMO then what I think don't mean squat.
Again, ain't much disagreement on perhaps having it taken to a grand jury, but that's a DA's call based upon the evidence and the investigation.
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
