Originally Posted by Jahrs

Originally Posted by K22
Originally Posted by Jahrs
Come on now if you’re going to quote me quote accurately


Where did I misquote you? And if I did I apologize.



Originally Posted by K22
You say that all the "meat" you need is in the 66 books and no more is needed


This is what I said below. I didn't say that no more was needed, i said we"d never get to the end or to the totality of the meat that is contained inside the Old and New testaments in two lifetimes put together.
Thank you


Originally Posted by Jahrs
Between the O T and the N T the meat therein will last you and I both a lifetime. I summit to you we’d never come to the end of that meat my brother! There is no need for me to search for Scripture elsewhere as I am perfectly satisfied with what’s there.



It appears that I not only quoted you correct, but also your thoughts that the other books are not needed.
Quote
Any Holy Bible that you want to use as long as there are 66 boks in it.

Not 65 books or 105 books, but 66 books.

So here I am in a debate concerning books I have read and studied while those debating against me have not read nor studied them. That makes me a fool for debating and those debating against it not having read nor studied them foolish. This is going nowhere.
I offer my blessings to you and hope you fair well.