This is all getting rather silly and hard to read. One has to have documented moral beliefs in order to comment on the perceived differences between the OT and NT? And those moral beliefs must conform to some standard for the opinion not to be dismissed out of hand? Sounds like a liberal progressive theme. Disagree with the orthodoxy (as proclaimed by AOC) and you are deemed worthless and your opinion amounts to nothing more than gibberish. Socrates would be shocked.

The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh

Which explains a lot.