Originally Posted by Thunderstick


I was saying you ought to study church history from original sources--the ante-Nicene and Nicene works. That is by far the largest source of original data.Skeptic scholarship assumes they can revise history to suit their objectives, But as I pointed out there history of the canon is fraught with unfounded speculation and lack of facts. Maybe they don't study history.



You assume too much. I was referring not to 'Skeptic scholarship' but to academic studies of the history and development of the bible.