Originally Posted by nighthawk
This is all getting rather silly and hard to read. One has to have documented moral beliefs in order to comment on the perceived differences between the OT and NT? And those moral beliefs must conform to some standard for the opinion not to be dismissed out of hand? Sounds like a liberal progressive theme. Disagree with the orthodoxy (as proclaimed by AOC) and you are deemed worthless and your opinion amounts to nothing more than gibberish. Socrates would be shocked.


Yes, the degree of denial is quite astonishing. The definition of a contradiction is not that difficult to grasp. A contradiction within a book or sentence does not entail the beliefs or moral standards of reader. To impose such a condition is absurd.