It hasn't been shown the Big Bang is science, based on the number evolutionary scientists who reject it. It hasn't been shown that evolution is science based on the number of Ph.D. scientists who reject it. We all live and work from faith. Some admit it others don't.
Rich, tell us more of these Ph.D scientists whom have rejected evolution.
Do they reject that the many species of Darwin's Galapagos finches had a common ancestor? Or a line of transition as they migrated from island to island?
Do they deny the evolution of wolves into poddles, labrador retrievers, and great danes?
Do they deny the many and varied species of cichlid fishes across several continents have a common ancestor?
How do they explain the proliferation of species upon the Earth over the last 66 million years since the great Cretaceous Extinction Event left almost 80% of Earth species intantaneously extinct?
How do they explain the plethora of marsupials in Australia, and the absence of any mammals?
People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.
