I have a feeling that it’s fairly common for a modern believer of scientism to the man empirical data, but ignore the theory real use of data that is collected through legal-historical methodology. I think it’s fun to watch the desert and deflect techniques used when challenged with the rationale of their own thinking. They always seem to run to something else. There definitely isn’t a lot of serious, intellectual energy being exerted. Rather, a very well memorized apologetic response. random data and half byte always showing up together to tag team is definitely suspect.
