- - - - Believe or suffer the consequences is a rule that a tyrant might impose, not a God of love.
This is ideological magic - or simply phony talk designed to attack - from an avowed atheist posing as an expert on what God would do - while he states that there is no God. Incredibility.
Nope, basic logic is not an attack.
What do you think Pascals Wager entails?
The point of the wager is salvation through belief.
If believing in God is not a factor, it would make no difference whether you believe or not, so there is no need for Pascals Wager or believing in God in order to be saved.
That the Wager assumes that believing in God is a necessary condition for salvation says something about the nature of the entity who would impose such a condition.
