Much of the discussion that has been a significant part of so many of these types of threads pertains to evidence: and I see in the evidence…science, nature, reason and logic, and history…that God exists, and that He acted in history. And that the Word (God the Son) actually became flesh and lived among people in the early first century, and those He lived among reliably documented it for the rest of us. And that Jesus actually rose from the dead, and that the New Testament documents are reliable accounts of what actually happened.
Based on your remark, your interpretation of what evidence is and what it happens to support is flawed.
Again, the existence of the universe is evidence of its existence, nothing more. How it came came about, or if it did, has yet to be determined.
''The universe exists, therefore God'' is not a valid argument because it excludes any number of possibilities, and perhaps some yet to be imagined.
