You noticed that too, huh? And repeating dismissive lines like, "Go prove (the unprovable)."
Each proposition holds it's own burden of proof, and in order to be a scientifically valid proposition it must be falsifiable.
Re-read TRH's last post.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
So let him publish a paper disproving evolution in a proper biology journal and see if the field agrees with him. That's how it's done.
There are many ways to falsify evolution, TRH is suggesting this guy take up the challenge and publish his findings in a proper peer review journal. By proper journal, he means a top scientific biological journal, not "The Journal for Creationist Research".
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
