Originally Posted by Ringman
Originally Posted by scoony
Originally Posted by Ringman


Truth is often rejected in favor of what the majority likes.


Evidence is often rejected in favor of what the majority likes.


The evolutionists and creationists use the same evidence. Evidence does not speak for itself. It is the bias the scientists bring to the lab or field that determines their interpretation of the evidence.

Originally Posted by DBT

Biogenesis is a work in progress. That's how science works. It is the creationist who adopts and endorses a set of beliefs and waves them around as if it was profound knowledge.


You still have not answered the question of Abiogenesis. The scientists have more or less proven life comes from life. (See above.) The simplest cell is considerably more complex than anything man has made; including entire cities. They don't spontaneously come into existence. Time is not the hero of this story. The more time, the more entropy.



Since the cities are made of many units containing the simple cells you outline, your statement is completely ridiculous

Last edited by Etoh; 08/18/19.

Most people don't have what it takes to get old