Oh yes, and let's play the numbers game again when it suits us--all credible scientists are Darwinists. But when its convenient lets use Galileo to show real science being with the minority. No wait, that was religion against Galileo. Yes that's the difference in the two scenarios! We won't admit that Galileo was a theistic scientist also because that would ruin the dichotomy we tried to contrive. I think its best if we just stick to "all credible scientists are Darwinists" because we have the most luck with scorn, emotional outbursts, and liberal government mandates to keep our Darwinian agenda moving--we can't risk letting the survival of our agenda to chance lest it mutates and selects a better option.
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use" - Galileo
