I've read that there is far more evidence to prove creation than evolution.
You read it in Creationist literature. It's not science.
Originally Posted by Dixie_Dude
I Evolution was pushed by athiests, Marxists, and Communists for over 100 years.
It's not pushed by anyone. It has stood both scrutiny and attack for 150 years.
Originally Posted by Dixie_Dude
Life was created.
Not according to the evidence.
Creationist literature is most likely more scientific than secular literature. At least they don't have change their discoveries. You challenge Jason Lisle's in the sun? You don't believe Henry Morris use of hydraulics is used by evolutionists?
The evidence for creation is at least the DNA and RNA molecules. Because your blind faith is so strong you can not see facts.
Good luck with proving that RNA and DNA is evidence for creation. That science is reviewed is its strength, not weakness.
It is the dogma of faith asserted as truth that is a weakness when it comes to sorting fact from fiction.
Each religion asserting their own faith, yet contradicting each other on the nature of 'truth.'
I'm still waiting for a cogent explanation of how these molecules evolved, please. Please don't appeal to Dr. Crick's explanation that spacemen brought them. That only sparks the question, from where did the spacemen come.
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation." Everyday Hunter
