There is no sign of the presence of a God who regulates or manipulates genetic activity, for example.
That's a far cry from evidence that God is not involved, don't you think? You made the contention that God is not involved, to prove that requires that you prove the negative, not just say "there's no evidence for it.". Where's your evidence to prove the negative?
I've read a few of those books, nowhere did I see any discussion on any evidence for or against God's involvement.
