Pick one. Rhagolitis flies, multiple species. Hawaiian drosopholids. Lots of them. Squirrels, mice, you name it. They are all around you.
Here is an interesting lift from an article on "genetic" issues can conflict with prevailing evolutionary theory:
"…..Change resulting from selective breeding is not the same as evolutionary change. Evolution, by means of new mutations and utilizing all the sub-processes can achieve much more comprehensive optimization of all of the organism’s characteristics. Because the comprehensive process is much longer, the apparent timing difference between group and individual selection is dramatically reduced increasing the feasibility of group selection. [u]This issue is probably the single most important issue in the continuing controversy between traditional and alternative evolutionary mechanics theories[/u
Yep, the rhagolits flies all remain flies.... all the same genotype.... squirrels, mice, monkeys.... all the same genotype.
One scientist went through 60,000 generations of bacteria.... all remained bacteria.... same with all the fruit fly experiments. ALL known efforts to force "macro-evolution" in the lab have failed.
The examples you provided are all examples of "genetic variation" within a genotype and ARE NOT examples of "macro-evolution."
The scientific community has changed the definition of "evolution" so as to include simple genetic variation. They have duped the unsuspecting crowds.
Last edited by TF49; 08/14/19. Reason: spel chek
The tax collector said: “Lord Jesus, have mercy on me, a sinner.” Jesus said he went home “justified.”
