It's a general observation ... Its tried by folks who study law and not science, and who are trying to take a society down a liberal path of socialism, and in order to do so need to get it banned from the public school system. However it is not legally banned from being taught in all states here. The communists also followed this path and banned theistic science also under the guise of true science. The real intent here is not to teach pure science at all, but rather to ensure the erosion of all moral absolutes from our theistic based societies.
Spewing more garbage again, so early in the morning.
So, perhaps you can tell us WHY the real intent of schools is to NOT teach science and how do they benefit or profit from ensuring the erosion of all moral absolutes? What is in it for them?
You are so ridiculous, but at least we can laugh at you.
Sounds like another emotional outburst--use sarcasm when lacking substance.
Maybe you could discover an answer on your own if you can tell us why the NEA would encourage teachers to only present science from one point of view. If for some reason you cannot comprehend the clash taking place in public schools regarding the teachings on gender and sexuality and moral absolutes you are living in isolation or in denial. Gender and sexuality issues can only be redefined if we first remove the moral basis for properly understanding gender and sexuality that is given at birth in our DNA. A deceptive way of redefining gender and sexuality is by first using science to attack the idea of the existence of God under the guise of teaching science. Then when we come to biology and sociology we can establish a new morality for gender and sexuality related topics. A person does not need to be very astute to notice the obvious connections.
