Logic tells us that a conviction of truth should be justified with evidence, and that evidence is a body of information that anyone can access and come to a similar conclusion. ...
You wish this is true. Every evolutionist I read about was refuted by another evolutionist. Evolutionists refute creationist even when they have the facts. Therefore your logic is flawed. People will not come to a similar conclusion. They are people, after all.
Any 'refutation' by evolutionists only happens in relation to the mechanisms, the theory, minor details, the significance of this or that bone particle... not the fact of evolution.
But perhaps you'd like to back your claim? No? Thought not.
