Originally Posted by Ringman
Originally Posted by DBT
lYour question was silly the first time you asked it, and nothing has changed since. The vast majority of scientists who work in the field can see the evidence for evolution. Creationism has no evidence. If someone switches to creationism, it is for private reasons...most likely credulity: how can such complexity emerge spontaneously....which is a fallacious assumption.


Your lack of concern for the truth is what is silly. The reason they switched is the overwhelming facts could no longer be ignored. Occasionally they get ridiculed by their former colleagues. Some times they loose their jobs.


Quote
how can such complexity emerge spontaneously....which is a fallacious assumption


I don't understand. What are you trying to communicate here? Are you saying complexity can not emerge spontaneously? I agree if that is what you are saying. Everything that happens needs and adequate cause; which is always greater than the results.


Truth?

Who switched? What percentage? Can you give an actual list and percentage of scientists who have rejected evolution in favour of creationism?