Truth is often rejected in favor of what the majority likes.
Evidence is often rejected in favor of what the majority likes.
The evolutionists and creationists use the same evidence. Evidence does not speak for itself. It is the bias the scientists bring to the lab or field that determines their interpretation of the evidence.
Originally Posted by DBT
Biogenesis is a work in progress. That's how science works. It is the creationist who adopts and endorses a set of beliefs and waves them around as if it was profound knowledge.
You still have not answered the question of Abiogenesis. The scientists have more or less proven life comes from life. (See above.) The simplest cell is considerably more complex than anything man has made; including entire cities. They don't spontaneously come into existence. Time is not the hero of this story. The more time, the more entropy.
It has been shown that entropy can, and is reversed within a system given energy input, loss in one, gain in the other....the system losing energy feeding the system which gains energy and evolves complexity.
Plus you are invoking the fallacy of irreducible complexity again. Whole cells did not pop into existence fully formed...organic molocules, RNA, etc.
Of what use is RNA outside of a cell?
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation." Everyday Hunter
