Once again, since we have identified the human genome, and can now read the genes of archeological remains many thousands of years in age. We have identified multiple cases of beneficial mutations causing increased brain capacity and survival oriented physiology.
The most recent and glaring occasion being the rise of lactose tolerance. In several places, in several locations in Africa, The Middle East, And in Europe, over the last 20,000 years different mutations have arisen. Each mutation produced a different gene, but each time the gene caused the body to produce Lactase through adulthood.
Lactose tolerance turned out to be a very important survival factor, and quickly spread through continental populations.
Meyer seems to claim the chance of such a beneficial mutation occurring once is so infinitesimally small as to be impossible. So how did it happen three different times in three discrete populations?
I think your example is not the case which is in question. There is no dispute about a specie adapting to its environment. The evidence lacking is for a situation where mutations are required to -- say evolve the ape into a man.
You continue to insist on this ape into man thing, even when you have been told that is not what happened. Explaining things to you is a complete waste of time.
