In any case the question would be valid whether you are aware or not. But the point is that to engage even in the contemplation of philosophy you must assume that there is something capable of contemplation. Or more broadly certain assumptions must be (carefully) made before the question posed can be rationally discussed.
We've already demonstrated why this argument is fallacious.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
