Atheistic evolutionary science proponents and their legal liberal socialist lackeys are the ones who trying to shut down free speech and intelligent scientific discussion by using legal suppression. They are trying to suppress it on the basis of a constitution that was written by theists. The constitution says there should be no prohibition on the free exercise of religion and yet atheistic evolutionary proponents says that we cannot allow theism to influence our understanding of science, but yet it is perfectly acceptable for atheism to control our understanding of science. How illogical is that? If the arguments of evolution are reasonably incontrovertible, then all reasonable people will believe them. If all reasonable people will not believe them, why not have a reasonable debate?
Because ID is not science. The reasonable debate has been done. ID lost - by a landside. Time to move on.
