How can you call something science which excludes logic, math, and statistical probability? Take those elements out of science categorically and you will have no reliable building blocks from which to draw any scientific conclusions. Removing them from the origins model simply means that the model is no longer scientific and that the conclusions being drawn from such a selective model are not scientific. So until someone comes up with a mathematical and statistical case of probability that is demonstrated in a repeatedly sustainable model to show life spontaneously generating from random materialistic processes that start with nothing; we should not even consider it intelligently viable.
We know enough already to know this model will never be developed because we already know it is impossible. We also know that just like liberalism, which is also bereft of sound logic, it will continue to be popular among those who want to believe it.
Science requires the miracle of creation because it has already proven that it cannot start without that pre-existing miracle to have first occurred. In other words science and logic require a start from something that is eternally self-existent in order to provide a starting point for science to have something to study and observe.
