In the intervening years, since the stoning of sodomites was instituted, it was discovered that many of them were beloved family members who had strayed, some were productive members of society, the world became smaller and we found that in some cases stoning weird family members was not always looked upon as a good thing to do, and generally society itself has become less likely to stone folks for any offense.
Would that be considered new data for the philosophical/theological for the discussion of stoning those with alternative sexual preferences?
Geno
How can God, who knows supposedly knows EVERYTHING collect new data and learn?
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
