lYour question was silly the first time you asked it, and nothing has changed since. The vast majority of scientists who work in the field can see the evidence for evolution. Creationism has no evidence. If someone switches to creationism, it is for private reasons...most likely credulity: how can such complexity emerge spontaneously....which is a fallacious assumption.
I don't understand. What are you trying to communicate here? Are you saying complexity can not emerge spontaneously? I agree if that is what you are saying. Everything that happens needs and adequate cause; which is always greater than the results.
I'm saying that complex systems can and do form on the basis of physics, chemistry, energy input, etc, how these systems form being determined by composition and the prevailing states and conditions, be it stars, galaxies , planets, moons, comets, organic chemistry, weather patterns...google for examples if you are not sure.
From this are you expecting me to believe a result can be greater than its cause?
You don't have to believe it. The functioning of your computer - for just one example - is greater than the sum of its parts. The collection of parts in the right order, apply energy and you get marvelous information processing activity that has never existed before computers....and before you invoke a designer, there is a difference between natural systems and obviously constructed systems.
