This thread started on July 14th (Bastille Day) 2018 and with all of the disagreements no one has arrived at anything that can be called "truth".
Reading between the lines I have to say, at least you are honest. You certainly have not found the truth.
Truth seekers need to clearly define what they are looking for.
There are two types of "truths".
Primary "truth" is existential, that which exists. Does bigfoot exist? Does extraterrestrial life exist? Does Q exist? What does the physical evidence say?
Secondary truths involve "knowledge" sharing through language and writing. Knowledge is based on both individual and collective experience and can be defined as interpretation, explanation, and understanding..
1. "Honesty" is pretty self explanatory as a type of secondary truth, the problem with honesty is that even honest information sharing can be mistaken or simply wrong, and then there are liars who simply make stuff up to deceive others.
2. "Agreement" (or conformity) with facts or assertions to facts is also another form of secondary truth. If we don't all agree on what the facts are then it's safe to say that we haven't arrived at this type of truth (aka agreement). It's quite clear on this thread that there is a lot disagreement about who Q is, and whether Q has been honest or deceptive.
3. Accuracy in the way we communicate our experiences.
Have we arrived at some sort of "truth"? Can you honestly state what we all can agree on when it comes to Q?
"You certainly have not found the truth" either.
Remember why, specifically, the Bill of Rights was written...remember its purpose. It was written to limit the power of government over the individual.
There is no believing a liar, even when he speaks the truth.
