We? Are you trying to include yourself into a group that you hourly put down in such a fashion that deserves a broken nose at the minimum. . . . . .? Pity.
Get over yourself and your use of the “Queen’s” WE. . . . . .
I’ll take that to mean we do not have anything concrete to back this up. Not surprised considering the make-up of this thread.
Carry on.
Do you have a source that can verify this to be false? No, I didn't think so.
the burden of proof is always on the claim that X exists rather than on the claim that X does not exist. It is a fallacy to claim that X exists unless you prove that there is no X.
And I contend that is upside down. I make a claim, you can question it all you like, but without factual rebuttal, you can't factually question it.
