Originally Posted by jaguartx
Jell0, diddler, la Roye, your commie buds in the deep state (Comey, Brennan and Clapper) said they supported the i
Surveillence of Trump because they were worried about Russian interference affecting the election, why are they not claiming to be heros now for protecting the election rather than now pointing fingers of blame at each other?


https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2019/05/16/coup-conspirators-at-each-others-throats/

They’re blaming each other variously for leaking or for misrepresenting the importance of the dossier in the FISA probe. They’re all now starting to backtrack from their hard, fast positions of the investigation. They’re backtracking from this whole notion that Rosenstein wanted to wire up, try to get Trump discriminating himself, 25th Amendment for inserting the unverified dossier in the presidential intelligence briefing. But here’s the question. Instead of all of them starting to point fingers at each other, instead of all of them trying to blame each other, why aren’t they still claiming credit for it?

Why aren’t they holding to their original positions that Trump was a traitor and that Trump was colluding or that Trump was hoping to collude or the Russians were hoping to collude? Why are they backing off of their original positions? Remember their original claim. They didn’t do anything wrong. They were only saving the republic. What they did was not only legal, but critical to the survival of the country. Trump was maybe partnering up with the Russians.

Why don’t they stick with that?

Instead, they’re the ones backing off!

They’re the ones changing their stories. They’re the ones starting to point fingers at each other. If no crime took place — meaning if these guys didn’t do anything wrong, if there was no coup, if everything Comey did was aboveboard, if everything Clapper and Brennan did was aboveboard — why not continue taking credit for it? In fact, why isn’t Comey trying to take credit for the whole thing and telling us Brennan and Clapper had nothing to do with it?

Why aren’t any of them fighting the others for total credit? If their original purpose was to save America from the dastardly Russians and to protect American elections, why have they given that up? Why are they now starting to point fingers? Why are they now starting to claim, “No, it was his idea to use dossier.” “No, no, no, no, no. No! The dossier wasn’t mine. No, no, no, no.” All of them are backing off of everything they spent two years assuring is us was true.


Well, the answer to this is obvious. These people were lying from the get-go. Because if they were the patriots they claim to be, and if they were the saviors — if they were the people of impeccable character and moral strength to save America –they wouldn’t be giving this up.

They’d be hanging in. They’d be still insisting that what they did was crucial to save America. But, see, it was never that. What they did was never anything other than trying to ruin Donald Trump, overturn the election results, and get him thrown out of office. The fact that they’re now scurrying around and unable to maintain their original positions is really all you need to know about the falsity and the fallacious aspects of their original contentions.

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.